O
Salt Lake City
← Community
ZoningCommunity discussion

Mixed-Use (MU) Zoning Consolidation

Salt Lake City

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Supportive (5)Opposed (17)Concerned (9)Neutral (2)

At a glance

Public comments
33
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Jul 1, 2025.

Public comments (33)

OpposedClay SmithJul 1, 2025

Expressed opposition to rezoning 7th West from M-1 industrial, stating it would harm warehouse operations, increase traffic, and cause safety issues.

Council Formal Meeting - Jul 1, 2025 · 15:25 →
ConcernedCindy CromerJul 1, 2025

Raised concerns about historic preservation standards and the creation of two classes of historic properties under the zoning plan.

Council Formal Meeting - Jul 1, 2025 · 19:17 →
OpposedLynn SchwarzJul 1, 2025

Objected to excessive building heights in Sugar House under the MU-11 zone and requested a more measured approach.

Council Formal Meeting - Jul 1, 2025 · 32:14 →
OpposedJudi ShortJul 1, 2025

Argued that building heights in Sugar House are too high and pointed out a lack of adequate parking and transit support.

Council Formal Meeting - Jul 1, 2025 · 35:30 →
OpposedElizabeth WatsonJul 1, 2025

Urged the Council to reject high-density heights in Sugar House, arguing it would ruin the neighborhood character.

Council Formal Meeting - Jul 1, 2025 · 23:46 →
OpposedJose RuvalcabaJul 1, 2025

Expressed opposition to rezoning industrial land on 7th West, stating it would threaten heavy manufacturing operations like Nucor.

Council Formal Meeting - Jul 1, 2025 · 25:12 →
OpposedTim FredricksonJul 1, 2025

Stated strong opposition to the MU rezone, noting that M-1 zoning is essential for local businesses and jobs.

Council Formal Meeting - Jul 1, 2025 · 27:24 →
NeutralBen EngelJul 1, 2025

Requested clearer regulations for historic properties and commended efforts to streamline the development process.

Council Formal Meeting - Jul 1, 2025 · 28:13 →
ConcernedAnnie IsaacsonJul 1, 2025

Stated concerns about setback rules and urged the Council to prevent developers from circumventing code through design reviews.

Council Formal Meeting - Jul 1, 2025 · 48:57 →
SupportiveJames AlfondreJul 1, 2025

Expressed support for smart growth and vibrant urban spaces while questioning overly restrictive street setback requirements.

Council Formal Meeting - Jul 1, 2025 · 32:29 →
SupportiveJason WheelerJul 1, 2025

Supported the rezone, noting it allows workers to live closer to jobs and creates vibrant, pedestrian-friendly streets.

Council Formal Meeting - Jul 1, 2025 · 34:35 →
OpposedClay SmithMay 6, 2025

Expressed strong opposition to overlay districts and mixed-use changes near industrial areas, citing truck traffic and property devaluation.

Revised LBA, CRA and Council Formal Meeting - May 6, 2025 · 1:08:34 →
ConcernedJennifer GoodrumMay 6, 2025

Expressed concern about parking, traffic, and density impacts on the Two Pines condo neighborhood.

Revised LBA, CRA and Council Formal Meeting - May 6, 2025 · 1:10:46 →
NeutralCameron BroadbentMay 6, 2025

Requested a grace period through 2025 for property owners who recently obtained zoning changes or were actively developing under existing rules.

Revised LBA, CRA and Council Formal Meeting - May 6, 2025 · 1:11:59 →
OpposedJudy ShortMay 6, 2025

Objected to excessive building height allowances in Sugar House, arguing infrastructure and parking cannot support such density.

Revised LBA, CRA and Council Formal Meeting - May 6, 2025 · 1:13:04 →
SupportiveBen EngelMay 6, 2025

Expressed optimism that simplified zoning will reduce blight and hold property owners accountable, while stressing the need for adequate parking.

Revised LBA, CRA and Council Formal Meeting - May 6, 2025 · 1:15:09 →
ConcernedNoah ShephardsonMay 6, 2025

Expressed concern that the zoning changes would render Madbrook Donut's building on Hope Avenue non-complying without adequate exemptions compared to large retailers like Walmart.

Revised LBA, CRA and Council Formal Meeting - May 6, 2025 · 45:20 →
OpposedLynn SchwarzMay 6, 2025

Opposed massive upzoning and height increases up to 186 feet in the Sugar House Business District.

Revised LBA, CRA and Council Formal Meeting - May 6, 2025 · 1:20:00 →
OpposedJacqueline AndersonMay 6, 2025

Expressed concern over excessive building heights, minimal setbacks, and traffic congestion in the Avenues.

Revised LBA, CRA and Council Formal Meeting - May 6, 2025 · 1:22:06 →
ConcernedBrian HeslopMay 6, 2025

Expressed safety and operational concerns regarding introducing residential areas into industrial corridors used by heavy manufacturing.

Revised LBA, CRA and Council Formal Meeting - May 6, 2025 · 1:24:14 →
SupportiveSoren SimonsenMay 6, 2025

Advocated for expanding Jordan River riparian buffers beyond 100 feet and establishing an urban design division to oversee development.

Revised LBA, CRA and Council Formal Meeting - May 6, 2025 · 1:26:00 →
SupportiveMatt SadauckasMay 6, 2025

Supported streamlined zoning as a vital tool to increase housing variety, improve transit efficacy, and address homelessness.

Revised LBA, CRA and Council Formal Meeting - May 6, 2025 · 1:28:00 →
ConcernedJeff McComasMay 6, 2025

Expressed concern regarding the impact of mixed-use zoning on established industrial and warehouse areas along 700 West.

Revised LBA, CRA and Council Formal Meeting - May 6, 2025 · 1:17:37 →
OpposedScott AmundsenMay 6, 2025

Expressed concern over excessive building heights and smaller setbacks adjacent to residential homes.

Revised LBA, CRA and Council Formal Meeting - May 6, 2025 · 47:30 →
ConcernedJoe GallegosMay 6, 2025

Reported safety and trespassing issues caused by a vacant lot and demolition hole next to his property on Cleveland Avenue.

Revised LBA, CRA and Council Formal Meeting - May 6, 2025 · 48:37 →
OpposedAmy StarksMay 6, 2025

Argued that the zoning change threatens historic neighborhood character and blocks sunlight and privacy for homeowners.

Revised LBA, CRA and Council Formal Meeting - May 6, 2025 · 50:48 →
OpposedPaul CryerMay 6, 2025

Expressed concern that proposed high-density development will block sunlight and greenspace for a historic condo community.

Revised LBA, CRA and Council Formal Meeting - May 6, 2025 · 53:10 →
OpposedAlex HamoryMay 6, 2025

Urged protection for historic structures during adjacent construction and opposed relaxed rear setbacks.

Revised LBA, CRA and Council Formal Meeting - May 6, 2025 · 56:01 →
OpposedAnnie IsaacsonMay 6, 2025

Spoke as an architect against zero rear-yard setbacks, noting they create building conflicts and eliminate habitation needs.

Revised LBA, CRA and Council Formal Meeting - May 6, 2025 · 57:40 →
OpposedLarry HancockMay 6, 2025

Expressed concern over potential apartment development blocking views and exacerbating parking shortages in his historic neighborhood.

Revised LBA, CRA and Council Formal Meeting - May 6, 2025 · 1:00:00 →
ConcernedRichard PiggottMay 6, 2025

Expressed concern on behalf of Maverik Inc. regarding how new signage, lighting, and setback rules will impact convenience store operations and remodels.

Revised LBA, CRA and Council Formal Meeting - May 6, 2025 · 1:01:54 →
OpposedCindy CromerMay 6, 2025

Asked the council not to adopt the proposal, criticizing a requirement that buildings be on the city register for tax credits and warning of construction damage risks.

Revised LBA, CRA and Council Formal Meeting - May 6, 2025 · 1:04:00 →
ConcernedTim FredricksonMay 6, 2025

Highlighted the importance of preserving manufacturing uses for long-standing businesses like Olympia Sales & Manufacturing.

Revised LBA, CRA and Council Formal Meeting - May 6, 2025 · 1:06:16 →